Circumcision pluses outweigh risks – paediatricians
Chicago – The United States’ most influential paediatricians group says the health benefits of circumcision in newborn boys outweigh any risks and insurance companies should pay for it.
In its latest policy statement on circumcision, a procedure that has been declining nationwide, the American Academy of Paediatrics moves closer to an endorsement but says the decision should be up to parents.
“It’s not a verdict from on high,” said policy co-author Dr. Andrew Freedman.
“There’s not a one-size-fits-all-answer.”
But from a medical standpoint, circumcision’s benefits in reducing risk of disease outweigh its small risks, said Freedman, a paediatric urologist in Los Angeles.
Recent research bolstering evidence that circumcision reduces chances of infection with HIV and other sexually spread diseases, urinary tract infections and penis cancer influenced the academy to update their 13-year-old policy.
Their old stance said potential medical benefits were not sufficient to warrant recommending routinely circumcising newborn boys.
The new one says, “The benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it.”
The academy also says pain relief stronger than a sugar-coated pacifier is essential, usually an injection to numb the area.
The federal Centers for Disease Control and Convention has estimated circumcision costs range from about $200 to $600 nationwide.
Coverage varies among insurers and several states have stopped Medicaid funding for circumcisions.
The new policy was published on-line today in Pediatrics.
It comes amid ongoing debate over whether circumcision is medically necessary or a cosmetic procedure that critics say amounts to genital mutilation.
Activists favouring a circumcision ban made headway in putting it to a vote last year in San Francisco but a judge later knocked the measure off the city ballot, ruling that regulating medical procedures is up to the state, not city officials.
In Germany, Jewish and Muslim leaders have protested a regional court ruling in June that said circumcision amounts to bodily harm.
Meantime, a recent study projected that declining US circumcision rates could add more than $4 billion in health care costs in coming years because of increased illness and infections.
Circumcision involves removing foreskin at the tip of the penis.
The procedure can reduce germs that can grow underneath the foreskin, and complications, including bleeding and infection, are rare, the academy says.
Despite the US decline, about half of baby boys nationwide still undergo circumcision, or roughly 1 million each year.
The country’s overall rate is much higher than in other developed nations, but US rates vary by region and are higher in areas where it is a cultural or religious tradition, including among Jews and Muslims.
Psychologist Ronald Goldman, director of an anti-circumcision group, the Circumcision Resource Center, said studies show circumcision causes loss of sexual satisfaction – a claim the academy said is not supported by the research it reviewed – and can be psychologically harming.
Goldman contends medical studies showing benefits are flawed and that the academy’s new position is “out of step” with medical groups in other developed countries.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists took part in the research review that led to the new policy and has endorsed it.
Circumcisions in hospitals are typically performed by obstetricians or paediatricians.
The CDC also participated in the review, and will consider the academy’s updated policy in preparing its own recommendations, a CDC spokesperson said.
The agency has a fact sheet summarising circumcision’s potential health benefits and risks but no formal guidelines.